Landscaping has a strange problem online: the trade with the most visual product tends to have the least visual websites. Firms that build £40,000 gardens present them as thumbnails in a cramped grid, unlabelled, uncredited, with no story. Meanwhile the copy does the heavy lifting it was never meant to do.
The customer researching a garden redesign in Richmond isn't reading your paragraph about passion for outdoor living. They're flicking between your photos and two competitors' photos, on a phone, deciding whose work they can picture in their own garden. If your photos are smaller, slower to load, or harder to find, you lose — even if your work is better.
Then there's the enquiry-quality problem every landscaper knows: the Saturday spent quoting a job with a fifth of the budget it needs. That's a website failure too. A site that shows real projects with honest scope, and asks the right questions on the quote form, sends you enquiries that are already half qualified.
✗ The landscaper site you probably have
✓ The site that books consultations
Gallery page, three clicks deep, no captions
Best projects on the homepage, each with its own page
Photos compressed into a tiny grid
Full-width before/after pairs shot from the same angle
"We do design, build and maintenance" in one line
Three services, three pages, three kinds of buyer
BALI logo in the footer, unexplained
Membership and installer guarantees explained where buyers look
"Contact us" form with one empty message box
Quote form that asks job type, budget band and timeframe
Dead quiet from October to February
Maintenance plans and next-summer planning content working the off-season
Coverage: "London and surrounding areas"
A proper page for each borough and town you serve